I need help in trying to find where the "public" land is around Champlain. I seem to recall that any land underwater during a certain Lake level was considered public land. Does anyone know where I can find specifics about this? Thanks!
Matt
Property line on Champlain?
Re: Property line on Champlain?
I remember a case back some time ago in Missisquoi Bay, maybe even 25 years ago. Some fisherman were given tickets for being on someone's land in the spring. They were in a boat. It finally went to court and the ruling was that they were entitled to fish Lake Champlain to the high water mark. I remember it very well because I knew one of the men ticketed. Not sure where to find the exact info but if I remember correctly it's a federal regulation.
- Matt
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:52 am
- Species: Any
- Location: On, in or near water.
- Contact:
Re: Property line on Champlain?
Yes but I'm wondering what level that line is, and how it works if you're on foot. If you access the land owners property line from the Lake, can you stand on the first few feet of dry land, assuming it is underwater during flood levels?
Also, what if the land owner builds up a "bank" on the end of their property line by using rocks, but that "bank" they've made is underwater during flood levels, is it considered public land even though the rocks were purchased by the owner?
The "property" in question would be the Ferry launch in the Islands. We were on foot, fishing for bowfin near shore. After getting my buddy into his bowfin on a fly (a 32" beast) we were yelled at by Ferry workers that we were not allowed to be "fishing over here". Because it was, "private" property. The property in question was the rocks to the left of the picture, the ones next to the wall. We were standing there while fishing. Aside from being pathetic about it, I was outraged that they were even bugging us about it. In any case, I'd love to find out the legalities of this, and if they have any right preventing us from standing on those rocks to fish. Those rocks are most definitely below the flood levels as you can see on the side of the wall.
For reference, Lake Level was 96 ft yesterday, and it looks like flood stage is 100. Only further proves those lines on the concrete wall are the "flood stage" lines. I wonder who I should contact about this? I do not plan on letting a few disgruntled workers ruin my fishing due to power trips.
Also, what if the land owner builds up a "bank" on the end of their property line by using rocks, but that "bank" they've made is underwater during flood levels, is it considered public land even though the rocks were purchased by the owner?
The "property" in question would be the Ferry launch in the Islands. We were on foot, fishing for bowfin near shore. After getting my buddy into his bowfin on a fly (a 32" beast) we were yelled at by Ferry workers that we were not allowed to be "fishing over here". Because it was, "private" property. The property in question was the rocks to the left of the picture, the ones next to the wall. We were standing there while fishing. Aside from being pathetic about it, I was outraged that they were even bugging us about it. In any case, I'd love to find out the legalities of this, and if they have any right preventing us from standing on those rocks to fish. Those rocks are most definitely below the flood levels as you can see on the side of the wall.
For reference, Lake Level was 96 ft yesterday, and it looks like flood stage is 100. Only further proves those lines on the concrete wall are the "flood stage" lines. I wonder who I should contact about this? I do not plan on letting a few disgruntled workers ruin my fishing due to power trips.
Re: Property line on Champlain?
They probably consider it a security issue.
- Matt
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:52 am
- Species: Any
- Location: On, in or near water.
- Contact:
Re: Property line on Champlain?
How so? If the law states anything underwater is public property at the 100 ft lake stage, how can they legally tell someone that they cannot fish while standing next to that wall, granted those rocks are well inundated while the lake is at 100 ft.C-Hawk wrote:They probably consider it a security issue.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:54 am
- Species: Anything that bites
- Location: Burlington, VT
Re: Property line on Champlain?
Matt,Matt wrote:I need help in trying to find where the "public" land is around Champlain. I seem to recall that any land underwater during a certain Lake level was considered public land. Does anyone know where I can find specifics about this? Thanks!
Unfortunately, as I understand it, you've got the rule backwards. The law is that land is private property to the average low-water mark. This is a summary from UVM: http://www.uvm.edu/crs/resources/citizens/water.pdf
Whether or not they could order you away if you were standing in the water is another question as Article 67 of the Vermont Constitution (http://www.usconstitution.net/vtconst.html#Section67) guarantees the right to fish in all "boatable" waters of the state that are not entirely enclosed private property. That would be an interesting question to pose to the Fish and Wildlife Department, I would think.
- Matt
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:52 am
- Species: Any
- Location: On, in or near water.
- Contact:
Re: Property line on Champlain?
I found the same thing last night. Thank you. Looks like I'll be standing in the water from now on to avoid those knuckleheads.Boatless in BTV wrote:Matt,Matt wrote:I need help in trying to find where the "public" land is around Champlain. I seem to recall that any land underwater during a certain Lake level was considered public land. Does anyone know where I can find specifics about this? Thanks!
Unfortunately, as I understand it, you've got the rule backwards. The law is that land is private property to the average low-water mark. This is a summary from UVM: http://www.uvm.edu/crs/resources/citizens/water.pdf
Whether or not they could order you away if you were standing in the water is another question as Article 67 of the Vermont Constitution (http://www.usconstitution.net/vtconst.html#Section67) guarantees the right to fish in all "boatable" waters of the state that are not entirely enclosed private property. That would be an interesting question to pose to the Fish and Wildlife Department, I would think.
- Captain Paul
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:14 pm
- Species: lake trout,salmon,panfish
Re: Property line on Champlain?
Matt we went thru this well Goose hunting and I am pretty sure it is around 93 feet were private property ends
- Matt
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:52 am
- Species: Any
- Location: On, in or near water.
- Contact:
Re: Property line on Champlain?
Unfortunately, it is. Guess I'll have to get wet next time I want to fish that spot without being harassed.Captain Paul wrote:Matt we went thru this well Goose hunting and I am pretty sure it is around 93 feet were private property ends